News (4)

Excessive Enforcement and Unfair Licensing Could be “Next Post Office Scandal”

In a startling revelation, housing expert Des Taylor, Director of compliance company Landlord Licensing & Defence, has raised concerns over what he deems as the “next Post Office scandal” in the realm of housing management. Taylor asserts that local councils are intensifying their enforcement efforts against private landlords, subjecting them to excessive scrutiny and unfair licensing conditions, while simultaneously turning a blind eye to the maladministration rampant in council-funded social housing.

Taylor argues that tenants in social housing often face substandard treatment as local housing authorities fail to address repair issues and tackle instances of anti-social behaviour. Despite this negligence, private sector landlords find themselves held criminally liable for matters beyond their control by some of the same authorities.

Citing a recent case where an £18,800 compensation order was issued by the Housing Ombudsman, Taylor underscores the disparity in treatment. The order was related to a council’s failure to address a tenant’s repair request for 11 months, leaving severe issues of mould and damp unattended.

“In the private rented sector, a landlord would be hounded by enforcement operatives, face abatement notices and improvement notices, and risk serious legal action for non-compliance,” Taylor notes. He accuses council executives of incompetence and emphasizes the need for accountability.

Taylor further alleges that council staff spread lies and misinformation about private sector landlords, creating an unjust environment. He contends that the chief executives of these authorities are negligent, while simultaneously, council staff can penalize private landlords for their best efforts.

Describing the situation as scandalous, Taylor warns, “How councils deal with Private Sector Landlords is the next Post Office scandal, and they will be exposed and held accountable for their actions.”

Moreover, Taylor accuses councils of subcontracting tasks to firms that misadvise both landlords and tenants. He asserts that councils impose license conditions that are tantamount to entrapment and unfair practices. As an example, he highlights an incident where a council advisor suggested a landlord consider subletting, potentially transforming the property into a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO), despite planning restrictions and additional licensing in the area.

As the housing expert calls for transparency and fairness, it remains to be seen whether these allegations will prompt a re-evaluation of council practices and bring about the accountability Taylor advocates.

Share this…