The headline figure covers the whole justice system, while housing cases face a demanding practical test
The Government says it is maintaining annual recruitment of around 1,000 judges and tribunal members as the justice system responds to the Renters’ Rights Act. That sounds substantial, but landlords should look beyond the headline: the 1,000 posts cover all courts and tribunals, not housing cases alone.
What matters is how much usable capacity reaches county court possession work and the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber. Landlords have been promised clearer possession grounds and a system capable of dealing with valid claims swiftly. Tenants also need prompt decisions rather than months of uncertainty. Recruitment is welcome, but performance will be the real test.
The 1,000 figure needs qualification
In a parliamentary answer on 18 June, Courts Minister Sarah Sackman confirmed annual recruitment of around 1,000 judges and tribunal members across the entire courts and tribunals system. She also said specific recruitment was continuing for the Property Chamber, additional administrative staff had been recruited and an existing HM Courts and Tribunals Service site had been expanded into a centralised location for new rent appeals.
The Judicial Appointments Commission’s published results provide a more useful indication of housing-specific recruitment. During the first quarter of the 2026-27 financial year, an exercise for 45 fee-paid judges in the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber attracted 194 applications and resulted in 33 candidates being recommended.
That is meaningful additional capacity, but it is not the same as 1,000 new housing judges. Recruitment also takes time to translate into trained decision-makers, listed hearings and completed cases. The distinction matters because an impressive national number could coexist with pressure in particular courts or tribunal regions.
Possession claims are already rising
Ministry of Justice statistics updated on 19 August recorded 23,635 landlord possession claims in England and Wales between April and June 2026. That was 6% more than in the same quarter of 2025. Private landlord claims rose by 5%, while accelerated claims increased by 16%.
The later stages did not all rise. Possession orders were broadly stable, warrants fell by 6% and repossessions by county court bailiffs fell by 3%. The median time from claim to order was 7.6 weeks, but the median journey from claim to repossession was 27.1 weeks.
These figures should not be presented as proof that the Renters’ Rights Act has already overwhelmed the courts. The quarter included only two months after the main reforms commenced on 1 May, and many accelerated claims will relate to the previous Section 21 system. The first full quarter under the new regime will provide a clearer indication.
Why delays matter to both sides
With Section 21 abolished, landlords in England must rely on revised possession grounds and provide evidence that the relevant conditions have been met. Where a tenant disputes the ground or remains after notice expires, the court process becomes essential rather than optional.
A landlord facing serious arrears, antisocial behaviour or a genuine need to sell cannot absorb delay indefinitely. Mortgage payments, insurance, maintenance and legal costs continue while the case proceeds. Long, unpredictable waits can make landlords more cautious about who they accept and whether they remain in the sector at all.
Tenants also lose when cases drift. A household facing possession needs an early, fair decision and access to advice. Delay can increase arrears, prolong unsafe or hostile situations and make rehousing harder. Speed must therefore come from adequate staffing and effective case management, not from weakening either party’s right to be heard.
Digitisation could help – but it is not finished
The Government is developing a new end-to-end digital possession service for England and Wales. It is intended to allow claims and responses to be submitted online, documents to be filed electronically and parties to receive updates and outcomes without relying on repeated paper handling.
The official implementation roadmap provides for staged releases during 2026, with the full service expected around spring 2027. Until that system is complete and proven, landlords and tenants remain dependent on transitional processes and the capacity of individual courts.
Rent challenges present a separate risk. Ministers have centralised administration for new rent appeals and are considering a non-judicial body or mechanism to make initial rent determinations. That alternative remains subject to a viability assessment; it is a proposal, not an operational safeguard.
Judge the reform by outcomes
The Government should publish clear, regular measures showing how the new system performs: time from claim to first hearing, adjournment rates, time to order, warrant delays, rent-appeal volumes and regional variation. A single national recruitment total cannot reveal whether a landlord in a pressured county court or a tenant awaiting a rent decision is receiving timely justice.
The recruitment programme, centralised tribunal administration and digital court project are sensible responses. But none of them should be treated as success before they deliver dependable outcomes. Landlords do not need a promise that the justice system is larger; they need confidence that a well-evidenced, legitimate case will be processed fairly and within a predictable timescale.
The 1,000-post headline is therefore a starting point, not an answer. If the Renters’ Rights Act is to work for responsible landlords and tenants, court capacity must be visible where the pressure actually falls – and performance must be measured in weeks saved, errors prevented and cases resolved.
NetRent does not provide legal advice. This article represents our understanding of rental property law and is provided for general information only. Landlords should obtain independent legal or professional advice where appropriate.
Telephone: 01352 721300
Email: support@netrent.co.uk